One of the most uncomfortable things in the community is watching project teams frequently unlock large amounts of tokens. Walrus is no exception—3.5 billion WAL tokens held by investors, valued at about $49 million, are set to unlock starting March 27. With more than two months to go, the market is already getting restless. The recent price movements of WAL also hint at this—down 13.95% in 24 hours, and down 10.86% over the past week—many are discussing whether the market is already digesting the unlocking expectations in advance.



But after examining the data carefully, I think there's no need to be so pessimistic. Unlocking does require attention, but it isn't necessarily an absolute bad thing. The key is to look at a few critical indicators.

**How is the unlocking scale?**

3.5 billion tokens out of a total supply of 50 billion represent 7%. When distributed over the current circulating supply of 15.77 billion, that’s about 22.2%. It sounds like a lot, but don’t rush to conclusions. The truly concerning scenario is projects that unlock all at once, doubling the circulating supply—that would be disastrous. Walrus’s unlocking method is relatively moderate—investors must first pass a 12-month cliff period before unlocking begins, followed by linear releases, with a relatively steady pace.

**Will investors dump their holdings?**

Walrus raised $140 million in its March 2025 funding round, led by top-tier firms like a16z. Based on the valuation at that time, the investors’ entry cost was roughly between $0.15 and $0.20 per token. Currently, WAL is trading at about $0.138, which is close to the cost basis. From another perspective, if there’s a large-scale sell-off near the cost price, investors would be losing money. The more rational approach would be to gradually reduce holdings in batches or simply hold onto their tokens for better prices. This strategy is much more reliable than blindly dumping.

**Can the market absorb this amount?**

This is another important consideration. WAL’s recent 24-hour trading volume is around $1.85 million. To absorb the 3.5 billion tokens unlocking, market liquidity is indeed a constraint. However, if the unlock proceeds as planned in a linear fashion, the pressure will be significantly alleviated. Moreover, as the project develops and attention increases, trading volume may also improve.
WAL-3,74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
quietly_stakingvip
· 10h ago
a16z has already come in, so what are we afraid of? These kinds of institutions wouldn't be foolish enough to lose money by dumping the market. I buy the logic.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetectivevip
· 10h ago
Actually, these big institutions like a16z are not fools either; they wouldn't do something as stupid as selling at a loss...
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnonvip
· 10h ago
Hmm, data analysis is fine, but does a16z really act so rationally? It's a bear market now.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEyevip
· 10h ago
This logic is okay, but does a16z really act so rationally? I bet 5 bucks they will invest in batches.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalkervip
· 11h ago
actually, if we examine the unlock mechanics through game theory lens... a16z ain't gonna crater their own bags lol. the linear vesting part is key – fundamentally speaking, that's the difference between a rugpull scenario and just normal dilution. 185M daily volume seems tight on paper, but caveat: markets adapt when there's actual catalyst. seen this play out before.
Reply0
ContractTestervip
· 11h ago
Hmm, it seems that a16z and their team aren't that foolish either. The cost price has almost been crushed, so who would dare to sell off aggressively? However, with a daily trading volume of 1.85 million, releasing 350 million tokens linearly would still put some pressure on the market. Hopefully, the investors are rational enough.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperervip
· 11h ago
This logic doesn't seem convincing. Do you really think a16z would be that rational? Wake up, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)