Many people face a paralyzing financial dilemma: should they aggressively attack their outstanding debts or focus on building an emergency fund first? According to financial educator Jessica Moorhouse, the answer is clear—and it contradicts what many traditional money gurus recommend.
The Case Against Debt-First Strategy
Most financial advice seems straightforward: eliminate debt as quickly as possible. Yet Moorhouse challenges this conventional wisdom, explaining that this approach often backfires. When unexpected expenses arise—and they will—someone without emergency savings must rely on credit cards or loans to survive the crisis. This creates a paradox: by ignoring short-term financial security, you’re actually increasing the likelihood of taking on more debt.
“If you don’t have cash reserves, an emergency will set you back to square one,” Moorhouse explains. The reality is that life’s unpredictable events don’t care about your debt payoff schedule. A car repair, medical expense, or job loss can instantly undo months of debt reduction progress if you lack financial cushioning.
Why Emergency Reserves Come First
The financial priority should be simple: establish a safety net before launching into debt elimination mode. This isn’t about ignoring obligations—it’s about preventing financial catastrophe. Without an emergency fund, you’re one crisis away from accumulating additional debt, which defeats the entire purpose of paying down what you already owe.
Think of it as building your financial foundation. You wouldn’t reinforce the walls of a house while the foundation is crumbling. Similarly, trying to aggressively eliminate debt while living paycheck-to-paycheck is attempting structural repair on an unstable base.
The Practical Balance: How to Execute Both
Starting from nothing feels overwhelming, but Moorhouse suggests a realistic three-month target for living expenses as your ultimate goal. For those in precarious financial situations, the approach is incremental: save one month’s worth first, then build from there.
During this accumulation phase, your debt strategy changes:
Continue making minimum payments on all obligations
Don’t attempt aggressive payoff until your emergency fund reaches that three-month threshold
Once you have adequate reserves, redirect extra funds toward debt elimination
This dual approach prevents the trap where one financial setback erases your progress entirely. You’re protecting yourself while simultaneously maintaining your debt obligations—the best of both strategies.
The Bottom Line
The sequence matters: emergency fund establishes your financial foundation, then debt repayment accelerates. Reversing this order often extends the time you stay in debt, not shortens it. By prioritizing an emergency reserve, you’re actually being smarter about debt elimination in the long run.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Building an Emergency Fund While Managing Debt: Why the Order Matters More Than You Think
Many people face a paralyzing financial dilemma: should they aggressively attack their outstanding debts or focus on building an emergency fund first? According to financial educator Jessica Moorhouse, the answer is clear—and it contradicts what many traditional money gurus recommend.
The Case Against Debt-First Strategy
Most financial advice seems straightforward: eliminate debt as quickly as possible. Yet Moorhouse challenges this conventional wisdom, explaining that this approach often backfires. When unexpected expenses arise—and they will—someone without emergency savings must rely on credit cards or loans to survive the crisis. This creates a paradox: by ignoring short-term financial security, you’re actually increasing the likelihood of taking on more debt.
“If you don’t have cash reserves, an emergency will set you back to square one,” Moorhouse explains. The reality is that life’s unpredictable events don’t care about your debt payoff schedule. A car repair, medical expense, or job loss can instantly undo months of debt reduction progress if you lack financial cushioning.
Why Emergency Reserves Come First
The financial priority should be simple: establish a safety net before launching into debt elimination mode. This isn’t about ignoring obligations—it’s about preventing financial catastrophe. Without an emergency fund, you’re one crisis away from accumulating additional debt, which defeats the entire purpose of paying down what you already owe.
Think of it as building your financial foundation. You wouldn’t reinforce the walls of a house while the foundation is crumbling. Similarly, trying to aggressively eliminate debt while living paycheck-to-paycheck is attempting structural repair on an unstable base.
The Practical Balance: How to Execute Both
Starting from nothing feels overwhelming, but Moorhouse suggests a realistic three-month target for living expenses as your ultimate goal. For those in precarious financial situations, the approach is incremental: save one month’s worth first, then build from there.
During this accumulation phase, your debt strategy changes:
This dual approach prevents the trap where one financial setback erases your progress entirely. You’re protecting yourself while simultaneously maintaining your debt obligations—the best of both strategies.
The Bottom Line
The sequence matters: emergency fund establishes your financial foundation, then debt repayment accelerates. Reversing this order often extends the time you stay in debt, not shortens it. By prioritizing an emergency reserve, you’re actually being smarter about debt elimination in the long run.