Recently, I made an observation: whenever $BTC approaches a significant threshold, some influential voices in the square start to set the tone. This time, I paid close attention to a few well-known traders, especially those who hold considerable influence in the crypto circle. But I’ve always adhered to a principle: as long as there are people, there will never be a battle without defeat.
Since New Year’s Day, Bitcoin has been on the move, steadily climbing. When it reached the obvious resistance level of 97,900, some big influencers started to turn bullish, predicting it wouldn’t return to 90,000, and even calling for 102,000. The crowd on the square followed suit, and at this point, I felt an opportunity was emerging. So I chose to short some popular altcoins, precisely timing the big plunge at 8:03 AM on January 19, and completed my position clearing.
What about the subsequent trend? Bitcoin ultimately fell below 90,000, completely opposite to those optimistic forecasts. What’s interesting about this is that there are definitely seasoned bears in the market who might have seen through this setup long ago. But why do the voices we hear always seem to be those that make us hesitate or chase highs? Frankly, every voice is trying to show you a particular side. That’s just how the market works—those easy-to-mislead narratives tend to be the first to gain popularity, while truly rational analysis gets buried.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaLord420
· 11h ago
The big influencers leading the trend is an old trick. Listening to their hype will only make you lose money. Contrarian strategies are the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 11h ago
ngl the signal-to-noise ratio in this ecosystem is absolutely taxonomically broken... per my analysis, when 79k gets breached it's just mass copium distribution by the usual suspects. let me pull up my spreadsheet—this pattern repeats like clockwork, evolutionary dead-end behavior fr
Reply0
LayerZeroHero
· 11h ago
Big V's mouth, a liar's ghost. This guy has seen through it all. I'm just puzzled, why are the most optimistic voices always the first to spread? Truly sober people have already quietly laid out their plans in the corner.
Recently, I made an observation: whenever $BTC approaches a significant threshold, some influential voices in the square start to set the tone. This time, I paid close attention to a few well-known traders, especially those who hold considerable influence in the crypto circle. But I’ve always adhered to a principle: as long as there are people, there will never be a battle without defeat.
Since New Year’s Day, Bitcoin has been on the move, steadily climbing. When it reached the obvious resistance level of 97,900, some big influencers started to turn bullish, predicting it wouldn’t return to 90,000, and even calling for 102,000. The crowd on the square followed suit, and at this point, I felt an opportunity was emerging. So I chose to short some popular altcoins, precisely timing the big plunge at 8:03 AM on January 19, and completed my position clearing.
What about the subsequent trend? Bitcoin ultimately fell below 90,000, completely opposite to those optimistic forecasts. What’s interesting about this is that there are definitely seasoned bears in the market who might have seen through this setup long ago. But why do the voices we hear always seem to be those that make us hesitate or chase highs? Frankly, every voice is trying to show you a particular side. That’s just how the market works—those easy-to-mislead narratives tend to be the first to gain popularity, while truly rational analysis gets buried.