2026-01-20 21:23:06

These past few days, I’ve been reading some news, and the contrast is quite interesting.

What is the traditional financial sector up to? On the international political stage, the old tricks have reappeared—participating in high-level dialogues requires first paying real money. I heard someone wants a permanent seat on a high-level committee, offering 1 billion USD. This kind of play looks high-end, but it’s essentially a disguised form of interest exchange. Political games are still the same: information asymmetry, limited liquidity, and few participants.

What’s interesting is that while these traditional financial and political circles are showing off their grandeur, funds in the crypto world have quietly shifted to another path.

Take a leading DeFi protocol on the BNB Chain as an example. Its performance at the start of 2024 is quite impressive. Total locked value (TVL) has surpassed $43 billion, with a growth rate of over 520%. Without any political backing, it simply attracts capital through product design and user experience. The underlying logic is straightforward—replace trust endorsements with transparent code, and replace complex human relationships with efficient protocols.

What is its product logic? In short, it revolves around three directions:

**First, finding new outlets for traditional capital.** They launched a RWA (Real-World Asset Tokenization) market, with the core product allowing you to buy US Treasury yield rights using stablecoins. The annualized yield ranges from 3.65% to 4.71%, comparable to fixed-income products in traditional finance. In today’s uncertain environment, this stable safe-haven option has attracted cautious investors.

**Second, ambitions to expand.** There are plans to cross-chain to the Ethereum mainnet and develop on-chain credit lending systems. The ecosystem is expanding from single-chain to multi-chain, evolving from a single product to a complete financial matrix. This systematic expansion shows that the team isn’t just hyping concepts but building infrastructure.

**Third, leaving room for advanced players.** By combining different staking, lending, and re-investment strategies, there’s a chance to achieve an overall annualized return of around 30%. This isn’t a promise of outrageous profits but a realistic possibility based on protocol mechanisms. High risk correlates with high returns, but at least the logic is coherent.

The contrast is clear: on one side, the traditional world uses “billion-dollar tickets” to participate in decision-making, with only a few people involved; on the other side, the crypto world builds a relatively open and efficient financial system with code and protocols, where anyone with assets can participate.

As the global economy faces more uncertainties, DeFi protocols built on transparency and programmability are becoming important hubs of liquidity worldwide. Traditional finance still relies on the old tricks, while crypto finance continues to iterate. The future will be spoken by numbers.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_whisperer

· 44m ago

Traditional finance spends billions of dollars to buy seats, but here we speak with code and open access. Really, just look at the comparison to see who’s more ruthless. --- 430 billion TVL with a 520% growth rate—these numbers don’t lie. Compared to the billion-dollar ticketing approach, the difference is huge. --- 30% annualized yield sounds aggressive, but compared to those promises of cutting the leeks, at least the protocol logic is self-consistent. That’s true transparency. --- Honestly, RWA (Real-World Assets) really attracts money. U.S. Treasury yields over 3% are also decent, but who knows how long this heat will last. --- One requires a ticket, the other just needs tokens to play. Who will win in the future? We’ll see. Anyway, I choose openness. --- Multi-chain expansion is a good move, from BNB to Ethereum, the ambition is indeed big. Just worried that execution might not keep up with the concept. --- Staking and lending arbitrage, sounds simple but actual operation depends on risk. That 30% yield isn’t something everyone can get. --- A billion-dollar ticket fee really exposes the essence of finance. Comparing it to DeFi, it’s just way more straightforward.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 7h ago

Once this comparison is out, the traditional financial system really looks like a relic from the past --- A $1 billion ticket... but code is still more honest --- 430 billion locked with a 520% growth rate, this is the real vote with your wallet --- Open vs monopoly, one transparent, one black box, very obvious --- The RWA part is indeed interesting, on-chain government bond yields, traditional finance and crypto finally found their intersection --- A 30% annualized rate sounds impressive, but if the logic is self-consistent, it means it's not a scam, I agree with that --- While they were still building high walls, others had already dismantled the walls and replaced them with protocols --- Multi-chain expansion + lending systems, this is about building an ecosystem, not just hype, the difference is huge --- Traditional finance is always played by the same few people, Web3 at least gives everyone a chance, this argument doesn't hold water --- Information asymmetry vs transparent code, worlds apart

View OriginalReply0

BridgeTrustFund

· 7h ago

A billion-dollar ticket, but it's less transparent than a single line of code --- Traditional finance is still battling for the threshold, while we are already expanding in DeFi --- 43 billion locked, 520% growth... this is the true way for funds to vote --- Code doesn't lie, human relationships are changing every day --- An annualized 30% return mechanism, logical consistency is much more reliable than just hyping --- The move to cross-chain expansion shows the team is not here to just cut leeks --- RWA paired with stablecoins, even people in traditional finance can't sit still anymore --- One side invests a billion dollars for participation rights, while the other opens finance with zero barriers—this contrast is so ironic --- BNB Chain is indeed building infrastructure this time, not just hyping concepts --- Information symmetry, strong liquidity, many participants—cryptocurrency is crushing traditional methods like this

View OriginalReply0

ChainMelonWatcher

· 7h ago

$1 billion for a seat, traditional finance is really outrageous --- 430 billion locked, 520% growth, this is the real volume --- Code is much more reliable than human relationships, crypto has already won on this point --- 30% annualized sounds impressive, but as long as the protocol logic is self-consistent, it’s not a fly-by-night project --- Yeah, the traditional way is still playing with information asymmetry, while we are moving towards transparency and programmability --- RWA connecting with traditional finance is really a good idea, stable liquidity has found a new home --- The move to multi-chain expansion is brilliant; infrastructure is the long-term value --- Laughing out loud, a $1 billion seat vs. open DeFi, that’s a tough comparison --- The key is that anyone can participate, which traditional finance cannot do --- 520% growth is no joke, the product strength is right there

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 7h ago

Spending a billion dollars to buy a seat, forget it, I’d rather play DeFi --- 430 billion TSVL, this growth is truly incredible, how does traditional finance compare? --- Code is more reliable than personal relationships, there's no doubt about that --- 30% annualized return sounds great, but how to control the risk? Who can explain clearly? --- Another attack on traditional finance, but is DeFi really that transparent? --- Cross-chain expansion, isn’t that just another hype? --- I'm more concerned about how long this protocol can survive, not just hype --- Buying decision-making power with real money vs. code making the rules, those are indeed two different paths --- There’s some interest in the government bond yield rights, conservative players should take a look --- The play of information asymmetry, traditional finance really needs to reflect on this

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 8h ago

$1 billion ticket? Ha, isn't that just the play of the old aristocrats? Can't really hold back. --- $43 billion locked, a 520% increase. Honestly, I need to look at this number a few more times before I can believe it. --- Code replacing trust, I need to take a screenshot of this phrase. Listen up, traditional finance. --- Annualized 30% isn't violent? Then what was my previous operation playing at... --- Just crossing over to the Ethereum mainnet and it's done? Still depends on how well the execution is. --- Suddenly I understand why all the funds are flowing into crypto; it’s indeed more transparent. --- We've been talking about open finance for years, and now it's really being validated with money. --- I'm just worried that if this protocol has a bug someday, a $1 billion ticket might actually be safer? --- I need to think about the RWA logic. US bonds at 4.7% still sound a bit attractive. --- Traditional finance is still playing mahjong, while crypto is already building a new system. Can it achieve exponential lead?

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 8h ago

10 billion USD tickets? Laughing out loud, isn't this just the high-level cutting of leeks in traditional finance? --- Eating with code is really much more爽 than relying on connections, transparency is completely on a different level --- 430 billion TVL with 520% growth rate, these numbers are indeed eye-catching, but it depends on how long they can sustain --- An annualized 30% sounds tempting, but the risks of portfolio strategies are also real, you need to protect the principal --- The traditional way of playing is basically information monopoly, now it’s been exposed by code, it must be uncomfortable --- RWA connecting to government bond yields is quite a move, equivalent to bringing CeFi stability on-chain --- Is the multi-chain expansion plan serious, or just another slogan protocol? --- It feels like the fundamental difference in capital flow is one relying on relationships, the other on mechanisms, and the latter has a bigger chance of winning

View OriginalReply0