Recently, the competition in the Layer 1 track has become overly intense, which has shifted my focus back to projects that concentrate on fundamental innovation. To be honest, speed alone among public chains no longer holds much significance. I’ve been pondering those architectural designs that emphasize high performance and high scalability—they truly address the core pain points of large-scale application deployment.
Frankly speaking, if transaction volumes really reach the trillion-level, can these public chains handle it? This is not alarmist talk but a problem that needs to be addressed in advance. From this perspective, projects that truly innovate from the underlying protocol are less about building tools and more about redefining interaction efficiency on the chain.
Compared to projects that follow trends and jump on hot topics, teams that focus on solid technical accumulation definitely have a different vibe. As someone who has been navigating this space for many years, the drive for innovation rooted in infrastructure gives me a sense of security I haven't felt in a long time. The market will always have various noises, but the moat created by technology is real.
Perhaps this is the kind of "delayed gratification" investment mindset—not chasing short-term ups and downs, but believing in long-term technological iteration. In such volatile markets, this kind of logical thinking actually helps you sleep soundly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVictim
· 8h ago
You're right, the speed arms race should have stopped long ago. Now it's a matter of who can truly withstand the pressure of the scene.
I've also been thinking about the trillion-level trading volume issue. Most L1s will probably be done for by then.
Projects rooted in infrastructure definitely have a different vibe; they're much more reliable compared to those riding the hype.
The term "delayed gratification" is used perfectly. Honestly, not chasing after price swings makes for a much better sleep.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 8h ago
You're absolutely right. Those chasing speed should wake up now. The ones who can truly survive are those who focus on infrastructure.
Regarding the trillion-level trading volume, most public chains haven't figured it out yet. Those throwing money to burn traffic will eventually face a backlash.
There is indeed a moat in the underlying protocol layer; everything else is just illusions. I'm also gradually reallocating my holdings.
Like you, I prefer to earn less quick money now and wait for projects with real technical accumulation to break through.
Watching others' short-term rapid rises every day, but in the long run, only those who trust in technology can sleep well.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 8h ago
That's right, the Layer 1 projects are indeed starting to focus on parameters, which is no longer meaningful. It still depends on who truly masters the underlying architecture.
Recently, the competition in the Layer 1 track has become overly intense, which has shifted my focus back to projects that concentrate on fundamental innovation. To be honest, speed alone among public chains no longer holds much significance. I’ve been pondering those architectural designs that emphasize high performance and high scalability—they truly address the core pain points of large-scale application deployment.
Frankly speaking, if transaction volumes really reach the trillion-level, can these public chains handle it? This is not alarmist talk but a problem that needs to be addressed in advance. From this perspective, projects that truly innovate from the underlying protocol are less about building tools and more about redefining interaction efficiency on the chain.
Compared to projects that follow trends and jump on hot topics, teams that focus on solid technical accumulation definitely have a different vibe. As someone who has been navigating this space for many years, the drive for innovation rooted in infrastructure gives me a sense of security I haven't felt in a long time. The market will always have various noises, but the moat created by technology is real.
Perhaps this is the kind of "delayed gratification" investment mindset—not chasing short-term ups and downs, but believing in long-term technological iteration. In such volatile markets, this kind of logical thinking actually helps you sleep soundly.