2026-01-20 22:21:18

As the cryptocurrency industry has developed to today, privacy and compliance are like natural adversaries—on one side are purely anonymous coins like Monero and Dash, representing the ideals of decentralized freedom; on the other side are fully transparent public blockchains, sacrificing privacy to meet regulatory requirements. The gray area between these two extremes is rarely explored by projects. Protecting user privacy while passing compliance checks sounds like an unsolvable problem.

DUSK Network is different. Since 2018, this project has decided to venture into this uncharted territory, determined to find a path between privacy and compliance. Interestingly, it never follows trends by hyping concepts or issuing tokens to drive price increases; instead, it has been focused on developing technology. While the entire crypto market pursues "quick fame," DUSK seems somewhat out of place—but it is this "non-conformity" that clarifies its positioning.

DUSK's approach is clear: it does not pursue the absolute privacy route like Monero, nor does it aim for complete transparency like Ethereum or Bitcoin. It seeks adjustable privacy and truly practical compliance. This idea sounds promising, but the key question is—can this path really work?

Supporting this concept is DUSK's "unified logic" in its underlying architecture design. This unity is reflected not only in technical implementation but also extends to market strategy and ecosystem development.

DASH-1,43%

DUSK21,71%

ETH-4,27%

BTC-1,95%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SneakyFlashloan

· 10h ago

Oh, another one making big promises? Can privacy and compliance really be both achieved? I think it's a gamble.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 10h ago

To be honest, finding a balance between privacy and compliance is indeed rare, but I still believe in DUSK's low-profile approach to technology over the past few years. It's more reliable than projects that shout slogans every day.

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner

· 10h ago

Listen to this idea—can privacy and compliance truly be balanced? I'm still a bit skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 10h ago

The irony is that every project claiming to find a balance in the "gray area" ends up either being crushed by regulators or rejected by the privacy community. Lesson from history: adjustable privacy = adjustable backdoor. It sounds nice to call it compliance, but in reality, it's self-castration. No matter how advanced DUSK's technology is, commercially it faces an unsolvable reality: your users either want privacy or accept transparency; the two have never been achievable at the same time. --- Data shows that over the past five years, privacy projects claiming to be the "middle ground" have on average underperformed the market by 34%. It's not that I am pessimistic about DUSK, but that this track itself is a false proposition. --- Focusing solely on technology? Well, since 2018, the price increase of coins has lagged behind BTC by a hundred times. Interestingly, the market seems to never reward "focus," only those who dare to hype concepts. --- The real issue isn't how to balance privacy and compliance, but whether there are killer applications. And I haven't seen any. --- What sounds nice as "not fitting in" is simply that they haven't grasped the market pulse. Compared to the user activity of Monero, DUSK falls far short.

View OriginalReply0