In the early hours of 2026, I turned off the trading screens flashing with frantic data and reprinted a technical document on privacy contracts. After spending so much time in this circle, one feeling has become increasingly profound: we’ve been constantly seeking security, but most projects only offer illusory liquidity.



Recently, I’ve been pondering a question repeatedly: what exactly is RWA lacking?

Honestly, turning property titles or bonds into tokens is technically quite simple—so simple that it’s almost pitiful. But now I am increasingly convinced that the real barrier lies in "how to achieve privacy settlement of these assets in a fully decentralized environment." I’ve spent a lot of time studying the principles of the Phoenix protocol and gradually realized that this might be the most feasible solution—enabling compliant funds to migrate smoothly onto the blockchain without harming commercial interests.

Looking at it from another angle: if I were the technical lead of a large asset management firm, what would I fear the most?

It would be that every hedge, every rebalancing is fully visible to the world. This kind of "full transparency" is fair to retail investors, but it’s a disaster for professional traders. The global visibility on public blockchains is equivalent to putting your trading strategies and risk exposures on display in the street. Then, consider the design logic of privacy contracts—combining zero-knowledge proofs with confidential states—this becomes especially necessary. It’s not just about stacking technology; it’s about understanding the essence of finance—finance is fundamentally a "protected information game."

Sometimes I also ask myself: is this obsession with technical details too detached from the market? In an era where traffic is king, such foundational infrastructure indeed seems somewhat out of place. But one voice has always been clear in my mind: if blockchain is truly to reshape traditional finance, its foundation must be privacy. A financial network without privacy is like a battlefield without defenses—no matter how fast you run, it’s useless. When faced with real professional players, you’ll be defeated instantly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MainnetDelayedAgainvip
· 8h ago
According to the database, the Phoenix protocol's promise has been dormant in the inventory for 827 days, and the ultimatum to "migrate to the blockchain" has passed. It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records. --- Again talking about privacy and the essence of finance, how long has the project team been fermenting their pie? Let's count. --- No matter how beautiful the words are, it’s useless. True professionals look at the launch date, not how sophisticated the tech stack is. --- Zero-knowledge proofs combined with confidential states sound impressive, but I don’t know when they will move from PPT to reality. Feel free to add data. --- I'll just wait patiently for the flowers to bloom. Anyway, the delays have been so long that waiting a bit longer won't hurt. --- I agree with hiding the trading strategy, but only if this thing can really be used. --- It will eventually be realized, right? It's been almost three years since the last promise. --- So, yes, the underlying infrastructure is important, but it has to be built first.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrinevip
· 8h ago
Really, privacy needs to be taken seriously, otherwise RWA is just a toy. I'm a bit interested in the zero-knowledge proof logic of the Phoenix protocol, but the problem is, will institutions really use it? To put it simply, liquidity is all virtual; if something happens one day, everything will go to zero. Underlying infrastructure is indeed niche, but without this foundation, everything is pointless, so we need to keep researching. Full transparency is like walking naked, no wonder big funds are avoiding public chains. Privacy contracts are the right path, it's just that there's not much hype in the short term. Instead of chasing hot topics, it's better to lay a solid technical foundation; it will be used sooner or later. Institutions fear their strategies being exposed the most; understanding this correctly is key. Technical details gather dust, but no one is willing to build this part, what a pity.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)