Think about it: traditional finance has made peace with inflation. They tell you rapid inflation is terrible, deflation is worse, so watching your money slowly evaporate year after year is... fine? Normal? Bitcoin fundamentally rejects this entire premise.
Here's another angle—conventional medicine frames rapid aging as a crisis and life extension as somehow equally dangerous. So gradual decline is acceptable? Bitcoin's ethos mirrors a different philosophy: why accept slow erosion of value when you can hold something that's genuinely scarce and resistant to debasement?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerWallet
· 4h ago
The reasoning is solid, but I always feel like the logic is a bit... forced haha
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 6h ago
Really, the traditional financial system's chronic inflation and cutting leeks, how did it become a rationalized existence... BTC directly rebels against this set of game rules.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 6h ago
I really can't stand the traditional financial logic of "boiling the frog in warm water." Clearly, inflation is slowly eating away at your principal, yet it's being described as a normal phenomenon? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 6h ago
The traditional financial system's slow and chronic way of cutting leeks is truly impressive. Bitcoin insists on going against the grain, and I just love this spirit.
Think about it: traditional finance has made peace with inflation. They tell you rapid inflation is terrible, deflation is worse, so watching your money slowly evaporate year after year is... fine? Normal? Bitcoin fundamentally rejects this entire premise.
Here's another angle—conventional medicine frames rapid aging as a crisis and life extension as somehow equally dangerous. So gradual decline is acceptable? Bitcoin's ethos mirrors a different philosophy: why accept slow erosion of value when you can hold something that's genuinely scarce and resistant to debasement?