2026-01-20 23:22:14

To be honest, many Web3 projects are still slow and laggy. But Vanar Chain is different — they start from modular technology, directly building a truly robust infrastructure for game developers and brands.

You see, whether it's hot NFT collectibles or complex esports revenue sharing systems, they can run stably on Vanar. This is very meaningful for developers. Traditional methods are either limited in functionality or prone to performance crashes. Now, there's a reliable alternative.

Another good thing about Vanar is their focus on integrating cutting-edge technologies like virtual engines. This can truly break down the barriers between reality and virtuality. It's not just vague promises, but practical solutions provided at the infrastructure level.

What is the significance of holding $VANRY? Simply put, it's about positioning yourself early in this ecosystem's growth phase. As applications on the mainnet become more abundant and on-chain activities continue to increase, the token's value capture ability will also rise accordingly. This is not just a promise, but a logical deduction based on economic models.

How the future Web3 entertainment wave will evolve and whether Vanar can become a key player — we will see.

VANRY-0,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainMemeDealer

· 6h ago

This time, Vanar seems to be really serious about its work, much more reliable than those boastful projects. Wait, how can modularization solve performance issues? I need to think more about this logic. If VANRY can truly capture value, it should have exploded already. Is it too late to buy now? Virtual engines connecting reality and virtual? Sounds dreamy, but can it be implemented? People playing NFT and eSports profit-sharing might really need a stable chain, and Vanar is not bragging about that. Looking at the project's execution ability is more reliable than the white paper. Vanar is at least seriously working on something. Token value capture sounds good, but in the end, it still depends on whether the ecosystem has real users. There are too many vapor projects.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 6h ago

Ironically, every time I hear the phrase "truly foundational infrastructure," I think of the stories of Flow and ImmutableX... Data shows that the retention rate of developers in projects within the same track is generally below 15%. Interestingly, the rhetoric of virtual engine integration and breaking down barriers was also used by VR projects 15 years ago. And what was the outcome? Is modularization truly an innovation or just superficial rebranding? I'm not trying to criticize, but let's look at the real ecosystem data before making claims. Economic model derivation = rising tide lifts all boats? Ha, that logic is like saying printing more money will make you rich... Historical lesson: projects that make the most promises tend to die the fastest. Looking back after half a year, will this article again be a classic "narrative collapse scene"? Do you want to bet or not?

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain

· 6h ago

Modularization is indeed attractive, but the ecosystem application is the key. Currently, we're still in the observation phase, waiting to see how many developers will actually come up and build.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 6h ago

Actually, I quite agree with the modular approach of Vanar, but there are really not many projects that can be truly implemented. Speaking of infrastructure now, everyone is touting performance stability, but after trying it a few times, you realize how exaggerated it is. If this thing can really support complex applications, it would be quite interesting, but currently it's still in the observation stage. The logic of $VANRY$ sounds comfortable, but the key question is whether it can truly support ecosystem expansion in the future. Wait, how exactly are they doing the virtual engine part? I didn't quite understand. Rather than betting on the future, it's better to see what projects are running on the mainnet now; data speaks for itself.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 6h ago

Modularization truly addresses the pain points; it's much more reliable than projects that only talk about concepts. Hey, do you think once Vanar creates something tangible, it's time to get on board? I'm still observing VANRY's current price; betting on the ecosystem taking off. Thinking that just having a stable NFT segment is already valuable; other projects have long been stuck. Game developers really lack this kind of infrastructure, which doesn't sound like typical marketing hype. The virtual engine integration part is interesting; if it can truly connect reality and virtual... well, time will tell. But honestly, it still depends on how the mainnet performs after launch; right now, it's all on paper data.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSauceMaster

· 6h ago

Modularization is indeed interesting, but it depends on the actual performance of the mainnet.

View OriginalReply0