In the triangle dilemma of scalability, practicality, and compliance, some projects have chosen completely different breakthrough directions. With AI-native and multi-scenario implementation as the dual-core engine, Layer 1 solutions are redefining the competitiveness of public chains.



The core innovation of these projects lies in the Proof of Reputation (PoR) mechanism. This is not a traditional PoW computational race, nor is it simply based on token holding priority like PoS, but rather directly grants node admission rights to entities with industry reputation — in other words, only institutions with high brand credibility can become validators. The advantages of this approach are obvious: Sybil attacks are virtually impossible, the open identity system significantly enhances network transparency, and ordinary token holders can participate in governance and earn rewards through delegated staking, forming a dual cycle of "reputation endorsement + equity incentives."

Technologically, the five-layer design seamlessly connects the entire chain from the base layer to industry applications. The underlying layer provides high throughput and low-cost transaction infrastructure, the Neutron layer handles data transformation — compressing raw information like PDFs and property rights documents into "Seeds" format that AI can directly read — and Kayon, as an on-chain AI inference engine, can bypass the oracle intermediary to directly perform compliance verification, condition triggering, and other logical judgments. This means blockchain has evolved from "only able to write code" to "able to read, understand, and infer."

The idea behind this combination is to bring blockchain technology closer to mainstream users and the real economy, rather than remaining confined within the small circle of crypto natives.
NTRN-0,04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 8h ago
PoR sounds like another design where "only big institutions can have fun," while ordinary people still get the short end of the stick. The reputation mechanism indeed prevents Sybil attacks, but it feels like repeating the centralized trap of traditional finance. The five-layer architecture sounds impressive, but can it really be implemented? Most of it is just pretty words in the white paper. Hmm... if AI reasoning can truly replace the costly and bleeding-edge oracle component, then I am all ears. It seems like they want to focus on the real economy, but hearing "closer to mainstream users" for the tenth time is getting old. It feels like betting on the AI + blockchain story, betting on whether the next wave can truly be realized.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomicsvip
· 8h ago
actually, if you run a basic correlation analysis on PoR vs network centralization, the math doesn't quite check out here...
Reply0
GateUser-a606bf0cvip
· 8h ago
The PoR concept is still interesting. Compared to those flashy things, Reputation endorsement + equity incentives sound good, but I'm worried it might just become a power concentration trick. Compressing Neutron into Seeds format—can AI really understand it directly? It still feels a bit mysterious. Skipping oracles and directly reasoning—how to control the risks? Isn't this just shifting the problem? A five-layer architecture sounds like solving the problem, but won't the adaptation cost be ridiculously high? Mainstream users and the real economy—well... it's easy to say, but it's good enough if it can really be implemented. If compliance can truly be achieved, that would indeed be a breakthrough. But the PoR mechanism still has centralized risks, relying only on brand credibility.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 8h ago
PoR this set of logic sounds good, but whether it can really be implemented remains to be seen --- Reputation mechanisms sound like a variant of centralized systems. How to ensure that these "high-reputation institutions" don't engage in insider trading --- Five-layer architecture + AI reasoning, feels like showing off skills again. But will it actually run smoothly --- Every project talks about getting closer to the real economy, but in the end, most are just speculators --- Sybil attacks are indeed formidable and hard to defend against, but does this also raise the entry barrier --- The Seeds format sounds fresh, but I wonder if it will be over-engineered again --- Can decentralization and practicality really be achieved simultaneously? It seems like a choice has to be made --- Delegated staking + reputation endorsement, this dual cycle looks comfortable, but the question is who defines the standards of reputation
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 8h ago
PoR sounds quite ideal, but I'm still concerned that its actual implementation will depend on whether institutions back it up effectively.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt