4 Privacy Cryptocurrencies to Watch: How They Work and Why They Soared

Source: PortaldoBitcoin Original Title: 4 Privacy Coins to Watch: How They Work and Why They Surged Original Link: Privacy cryptocurrencies have made a strong comeback to the center of the radar since the end of 2025, fueled by a narrative that mixes “protection” against on-chain tracking, search for assets uncorrelated with Bitcoin, and even specific triggers that impacted assets within this niche.

The movement continued in the first weeks of 2026, when coins like Monero (XMR) and Dash (DASH) managed to rise even on days when Bitcoin fell and the crypto market was negative. Both are among the top 10 cryptocurrencies that have increased the most this year so far: +72% for Dash and +21% for Monero.

Behind the rise, there is a combination of factors that goes beyond hype. The discussion about financial privacy gained weight with the expansion of on-chain analysis tools and the consolidation of monitoring rules and practices at exchanges, which increases demand for solutions that hide (completely or partially) sender, recipient, and amounts.

At the same time, because they are smaller markets more sensitive to concentrated flows, privacy cryptocurrencies tend to respond with above-average volatility when a narrative returns to the spotlight. This is the case of Zcash (ZEC), which once followed the sector’s upward movement but currently accumulates losses of 30% in 2026 amid an internal crisis that led to developers leaving the project.

What are privacy cryptocurrencies and how do they work

In a “traditional” blockchain, like Bitcoin’s, transactions are public: addresses, amounts, and the trail of money can be tracked. This has always been technically true, but it gained new weight in recent months with the advancement of analysis tools, increased regulatory scrutiny, and stricter enforcement of compliance rules.

Privacy cryptocurrencies try to address this point with cryptography. Instead of making sender, recipient, and amount explicit, they use techniques to hide or obfuscate these data, with varying degrees of privacy.

Generally, there are two main approaches: (1) models where privacy is default and the network “hides everything” (most associated with Monero), and (2) models where privacy is optional, with “transparent” and “shielded” transactions coexisting in the same ecosystem (like Dash).

Main privacy cryptocurrencies in the market

Monero (XMR)

Monero is the “symbol” of privacy coins not only because it is the largest but also because it aims to hide, by default, the three most sensitive elements of a transfer: who sends, who receives, and how much was sent.

To do this, it combines techniques like stealth addresses (endereços únicos por pagamento, que dificultam vincular recebimentos a uma carteira pública) and ring signatures (signatures in a ring, which mix the “real signer” with other participants to confuse the origin).

In practice, the idea is that an external observer can see that a valid transaction occurred but will have much more difficulty reconstructing “who paid whom” and the involved amount. This design also explains why XMR often comes back into the debate when concerns about traceability increase.

Zcash (ZEC)

Zcash uses zk-SNARKs (zero-knowledge proofs) to allow someone to prove that a transaction is valid without revealing sensitive information. In other words: the network can verify rules (such as sufficient balance and no double spending) without exposing all details publicly.

A key point is that ZEC can circulate in different “layers”: transactions can be transparent (similar to Bitcoin) or occur in shielded pools (“shielded”), where data is protected. This provides flexibility but also creates a challenge, since if most usage remains in transparent mode, the asset is not necessarily private in practice.

Dash (DASH)

Dash was created to function as “digital cash,” allowing sending and receiving values over the internet without relying on banks. Like other cryptocurrencies, transactions are recorded on a public blockchain, but it has an additional layer of advanced features that can include optional privacy, activated only if the user chooses.

The network is protected by mining, similar to Bitcoin, where computers compete to validate blocks and receive DASH rewards. The key difference is the second layer formed by masternodes, servers that must hold 1,000 DASH as collateral and stay online continuously to perform extra functions, such as InstantSend.

Privacy comes from PrivateSend, also associated with masternodes, and works through a “mixing” mechanism inspired by CoinJoin: the wallet fragments amounts and shuffles these parts with those of other users who also opt to use the feature, making it harder to link origin and destination by observing the public history.

Dusk (DUSK)

Dusk aims to occupy a different space within the universe of privacy cryptocurrencies. Instead of focusing solely on anonymous payments, the project positions itself as a blockchain oriented toward financial applications that require confidentiality, such as issuance and trading of assets, credit instruments, and corporate flows.

The promise is to allow sensitive data (saldos, valores e condições) to remain hidden in the public layer while still enabling the system to prove that transactions are valid. This often appears as “programmable privacy,” where the network seeks to offer tools for developers to build applications in which certain information is protected by cryptography (often with zero-knowledge proofs) but can be revealed on demand to authorized parties.

The moment of privacy cryptos

The “moment” of privacy coins combines three forces. The first is structural: with more tracking and stricter requirements, demand for some form of privacy grows, not always driven by ideology but as “risk management” and protection of financial data.

The second is market-driven: during periods of uncertainty and liquidations, investors seek defensive narratives and assets with lower correlation to Bitcoin, which tends to favor niches when flows are concentrated. The third is tactical: specific events can move volumes in relatively smaller markets and amplify volatility.

The conclusion is that the “return” of privacy cryptos is real but comes with two layers of caution: volatility and regulatory/commercial risk, including delistings, restrictions, and increased scrutiny in various countries. As the crypto economy matures, the discussion shifts from “privacy vs. transparency” to how to balance confidentiality, security, and compliance in public networks.