The current investment landscape is full of turmoil and unexpected changes. As gold prices have risen over 80% amid high inflation, geopolitical conflicts, and uncertainty in interest rates, Bitcoin continues to lead the decline—down 13.09% over the past year. This contrast has prompted deep questions within the cryptocurrency community about the true value and future of digital assets.
The “disturbance” in the market is not just about prices. It is a complex shift of investor interest from traditional wealth guardians to new paradigms, but the speed of this transition is slower than many expected.
Temporary Disturbance or Long-Term Change?
In discussions with industry experts, the consensus repeats: the current success of gold does not necessarily mean the death of Bitcoin. One interpretation is that everything is a temporary aberration in the market.
According to Jessy Gilger, senior advisor at Gannett Wealth Advisors, the rise in gold is a “temporary political disturbance.” During times of fear and uncertainty, institutional investors tend to revert to assets they recognize and trust. “Gold has a long history, but Bitcoin has shown that it is technically stable at the protocol level for over fifteen years,” Gilger said. His prognosis is optimistic: the market is just waiting for the moment to realize that digital scarcity is better than physical assets.
However, Andre Dragosch from Bitwise offers a more nuanced explanation. The phenomenon of “muscle memory” plays a role here—investors initially run to familiar assets. “The priority of familiarity over innovation is strong during stress,” he explains. Although Bitcoin, with its higher store-of-value properties, is still considered a riskier asset, Dragosch believes that when traditional hard assets become overbought, capital will begin to rotate into more attractive options like Bitcoin.
Money Flows: Where Is the Capital Really Going?
Deeper understanding of these dynamics comes from Mark Connors, chief investment officer of Risk Dimensions. His thesis is innovative: it’s not a demand failure problem—it’s a distribution phenomenon. “Institutional ETF inflows are huge, but they are not driving prices up. They are simply absorbing the supply dumped by early adopters over the past decade.”
Data supports this interpretation. U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced net inflows, while XRP ETFs gained $91.72 million in net inflows just last month—another proof of ongoing investment in digital assets despite pricing pressures.
For Charlie Morris, chief investment officer of ByteTree, the disturbance becomes clear when viewed in context. Gold and Bitcoin tell the same stories: limited supply, money printing, inflation, and conflict. But his paradigm is unique: “Gold is the reserve asset of the real world, while Bitcoin is the reserve asset of the digital world.” The problem is that liquidity now follows the needs of the real world. Bitcoin is not failing—it is declining along with internet stocks due to the deep correlation established since its creation.
Is Bitcoin Ready for the Next Stage?
The future is uncertain, but experts are thinking about new capabilities. Anthony Pompliano, chairman and CEO of ProCap Financial, leaves an intriguing consideration: “Bitcoin has primarily been an anti-inflation play over the past half-decade. But if we enter a deflationary environment, Bitcoin will need new demand drivers to continue growing.”
Peter Lane, CEO of Jacobi Asset Management, is more conservative in his outlook. The “digital gold” narrative has not proven effective in market tests. “Bitcoin has not behaved as a true inflation hedge or safe haven amid geopolitical stress and uncertainty. Instead, gold and silver will dominate in 2025.” However, Lane still believes in the possibility of a delayed rotation. Institutional comfort with precious metals is deep, and this is not easily changed—but it is not permanent.
David Parkinson, CEO of a Bitcoin lightning infrastructure company, has a more radical view. “‘Digital gold’ is just a misleading noise. The fixed supply and growing Bitcoin network deliver returns that outperform inflation and gold for many years. It is not just a hedge—it is a permanent solution to inflation.” According to relative Mayer multiple measurements, Bitcoin has reached levels last seen in 2022, indicating a possible rebound in 2026.
The landscape is complex, full of “disturbances”—temporary market distortions, supply dynamics, and investor psychology. But the long-term narrative continues to emerge. Some are waiting, while others are investing, believing that the market will ultimately prove them right.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin Reflects a Busy Market While Gold Leads the Rally
The current investment landscape is full of turmoil and unexpected changes. As gold prices have risen over 80% amid high inflation, geopolitical conflicts, and uncertainty in interest rates, Bitcoin continues to lead the decline—down 13.09% over the past year. This contrast has prompted deep questions within the cryptocurrency community about the true value and future of digital assets.
The “disturbance” in the market is not just about prices. It is a complex shift of investor interest from traditional wealth guardians to new paradigms, but the speed of this transition is slower than many expected.
Temporary Disturbance or Long-Term Change?
In discussions with industry experts, the consensus repeats: the current success of gold does not necessarily mean the death of Bitcoin. One interpretation is that everything is a temporary aberration in the market.
According to Jessy Gilger, senior advisor at Gannett Wealth Advisors, the rise in gold is a “temporary political disturbance.” During times of fear and uncertainty, institutional investors tend to revert to assets they recognize and trust. “Gold has a long history, but Bitcoin has shown that it is technically stable at the protocol level for over fifteen years,” Gilger said. His prognosis is optimistic: the market is just waiting for the moment to realize that digital scarcity is better than physical assets.
However, Andre Dragosch from Bitwise offers a more nuanced explanation. The phenomenon of “muscle memory” plays a role here—investors initially run to familiar assets. “The priority of familiarity over innovation is strong during stress,” he explains. Although Bitcoin, with its higher store-of-value properties, is still considered a riskier asset, Dragosch believes that when traditional hard assets become overbought, capital will begin to rotate into more attractive options like Bitcoin.
Money Flows: Where Is the Capital Really Going?
Deeper understanding of these dynamics comes from Mark Connors, chief investment officer of Risk Dimensions. His thesis is innovative: it’s not a demand failure problem—it’s a distribution phenomenon. “Institutional ETF inflows are huge, but they are not driving prices up. They are simply absorbing the supply dumped by early adopters over the past decade.”
Data supports this interpretation. U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced net inflows, while XRP ETFs gained $91.72 million in net inflows just last month—another proof of ongoing investment in digital assets despite pricing pressures.
For Charlie Morris, chief investment officer of ByteTree, the disturbance becomes clear when viewed in context. Gold and Bitcoin tell the same stories: limited supply, money printing, inflation, and conflict. But his paradigm is unique: “Gold is the reserve asset of the real world, while Bitcoin is the reserve asset of the digital world.” The problem is that liquidity now follows the needs of the real world. Bitcoin is not failing—it is declining along with internet stocks due to the deep correlation established since its creation.
Is Bitcoin Ready for the Next Stage?
The future is uncertain, but experts are thinking about new capabilities. Anthony Pompliano, chairman and CEO of ProCap Financial, leaves an intriguing consideration: “Bitcoin has primarily been an anti-inflation play over the past half-decade. But if we enter a deflationary environment, Bitcoin will need new demand drivers to continue growing.”
Peter Lane, CEO of Jacobi Asset Management, is more conservative in his outlook. The “digital gold” narrative has not proven effective in market tests. “Bitcoin has not behaved as a true inflation hedge or safe haven amid geopolitical stress and uncertainty. Instead, gold and silver will dominate in 2025.” However, Lane still believes in the possibility of a delayed rotation. Institutional comfort with precious metals is deep, and this is not easily changed—but it is not permanent.
David Parkinson, CEO of a Bitcoin lightning infrastructure company, has a more radical view. “‘Digital gold’ is just a misleading noise. The fixed supply and growing Bitcoin network deliver returns that outperform inflation and gold for many years. It is not just a hedge—it is a permanent solution to inflation.” According to relative Mayer multiple measurements, Bitcoin has reached levels last seen in 2022, indicating a possible rebound in 2026.
The landscape is complex, full of “disturbances”—temporary market distortions, supply dynamics, and investor psychology. But the long-term narrative continues to emerge. Some are waiting, while others are investing, believing that the market will ultimately prove them right.