Does anyone still remember that fundamental analysis was once the only righteous path in trading? I started trading in 1978, back then very few people used technical analysis, and most market participants even thought that those who did technical analysis were brain-damaged. Ironically, not long ago, those big funds and financial institutions on Wall Street turned around and regarded technical analysis as pseudoscience.
And now? The situation has completely reversed. Any experienced trader will have some kind of technical analysis tool in hand to plan their trades. Truly "pure" fundamental analysis is almost extinct, except for those isolated academic factions.
The reason behind this major shift in perspective is actually very straightforward—money. Using pure fundamental analysis to make trading decisions has an inherent fatal flaw: it cannot generate long-term stable profits.
If you're not very clear about what fundamental analysis is, let me explain. Whether it's stocks, commodities, or financial products, fundamental analysis involves considering all variables that influence supply and demand. It uses mathematical models to weigh various factors—interest rates, financial statements, weather, and all kinds of other elements you can think of—to ultimately forecast where prices should go.
But the fatal flaw of this model is: it completely ignores the variable of other traders. Market prices are driven by traders' beliefs and expectations, not by the model. Trading volume comes from traders; if traders have no idea about your model, or don't believe in it at all, then all the variables your model is based on become worthless. Analytical predictions? They become useless.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 1h ago
Pure fundamentals? That's a game for the wealthy; retail investors can't afford to play this set.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 12-14 10:41
Basically, the market is always playing psychological games; fundamentals are just a cover.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 12-13 23:50
The pure fundamental analysis approach is indeed outdated. To put it simply, it doesn't take human nature into account.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 12-13 23:46
The data shows that the pure fundamentals approach has indeed died out. However, technical analysis hasn't solved the bug of human nature either; ultimately, that approach will still collapse. Let's wait and see how the historical lows develop.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSage
· 12-13 23:43
Currently, no one is really playing pure fundamentals anymore; it's all a result of market education haha
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 12-13 23:39
It's really ironic, the fundamentals are now like antiques.
Pure mathematical models indeed can't beat market sentiment, gotta admit.
So, now only a minority still stubbornly stick to the fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 12-13 23:25
The pure fundamental approach is outdated. The current market is a psychological game; whoever has more chips makes the rules.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-13 23:25
Fundamentals? That thing has long been drowned by the market’s irrationality.
Does anyone still remember that fundamental analysis was once the only righteous path in trading? I started trading in 1978, back then very few people used technical analysis, and most market participants even thought that those who did technical analysis were brain-damaged. Ironically, not long ago, those big funds and financial institutions on Wall Street turned around and regarded technical analysis as pseudoscience.
And now? The situation has completely reversed. Any experienced trader will have some kind of technical analysis tool in hand to plan their trades. Truly "pure" fundamental analysis is almost extinct, except for those isolated academic factions.
The reason behind this major shift in perspective is actually very straightforward—money. Using pure fundamental analysis to make trading decisions has an inherent fatal flaw: it cannot generate long-term stable profits.
If you're not very clear about what fundamental analysis is, let me explain. Whether it's stocks, commodities, or financial products, fundamental analysis involves considering all variables that influence supply and demand. It uses mathematical models to weigh various factors—interest rates, financial statements, weather, and all kinds of other elements you can think of—to ultimately forecast where prices should go.
But the fatal flaw of this model is: it completely ignores the variable of other traders. Market prices are driven by traders' beliefs and expectations, not by the model. Trading volume comes from traders; if traders have no idea about your model, or don't believe in it at all, then all the variables your model is based on become worthless. Analytical predictions? They become useless.