A new approach to prediction platforms: aggregating public opinion to make trends more transparent

PriceOracleFairy · 2026-01-01T06:20:09+00:00

Recently, a prediction platform invited Ballon d'Or winner Owen to serve as a brand ambassador, aiming to gather user judgments and utilize collective intelligence to depict future events. This indicates that the platform is improving user behavior tracking and global deployment to build trust and a foundation.

PriceOracleFairy

2026-01-01 06:20:09

Abstract generation in progress

【CryptoWorld】Recently, a prediction platform has made a significant move—inviting 2001 Ballon d’Or winner Owen to serve as the global brand ambassador. At first glance, it seems like a publicity stunt, but the underlying logic is more interesting.

This type of platform aims to do something quite different: it’s not about always predicting the correct outcome, but about aggregating everyone’s judgments. Your opinions, his views, and the collective consensus are gradually outlined through mechanism design, sketching the contours of future events. To some extent, this is the power of collective intelligence—individual judgments can be published, and future events can also be judged collectively.

What is the platform doing now? Improving the user behavior tracking system and accelerating its global expansion. From celebrity endorsements to mechanism refinement, it appears to be building trust and a solid foundation for this system.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

screenshot_gains

· 3h ago

The logic behind Wisdom of the Crowd prediction is actually decentralized decision-making, where aggregating everyone's judgments can be more accurate... However, Owen endorsing this is still a bit surprising; how did a sports star get involved with prediction markets? The tracking system is back again, always claiming to improve it. Can the privacy aspects be made more transparent? If the aggregation mechanism is well-designed, there is indeed room for imagination; it all depends on whether the interaction depth is sufficient. This is what Web3 should be playing with, much more legitimate than those purely hype-driven schemes. Is collective intelligence reliable... I still have some doubts.

View OriginalReply0

APY追逐者

· 3h ago

Zhòngzhì aggregation is indeed more reliable than simple prediction. Collective intelligence crushing individual judgment is not a one-time or two-time occurrence.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 3h ago

Zhongzhi Prediction I am quite optimistic about this set of logic, it is much more reliable than simply relying on influencers' predictions. Be careful with the tracking system; otherwise, it might become another form of data harvesting. Having Owen endorse it is indeed a good angle, definitely better than those unorthodox endorsers in the crypto circle. The premise of collective judgment must be information symmetry; otherwise, it's just big players exploiting retail investors. Celebrity effect + mechanism innovation, this combination can indeed have an educational impact on the market.

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 3h ago

Zhongzhi Garden has opened a new bloom again, but this time is it watering with celebrities? To be honest, I am more concerned about whether this aggregation mechanism can truly withstand market noise, and not end up becoming an amplifier of herd mentality.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 3h ago

Zhongzhi Prediction's logic indeed plays new tricks, but I'm more concerned about how data transparency is ensured.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 3h ago

Crowd wisdom prediction sounds good, but whether you can really make money with it is another story. Celebrity endorsements are just a facade; the core is still data. Collective judgment sounds like democracy, but in reality, it's still the big players calling the shots. Tracking user behavior... that phrase sounds a bit creepy. Before trying to go global, can we first make the mechanism transparent? Just listen to crowd wisdom; I still trust my own judgment. But this approach is indeed more interesting than simply predicting right or wrong. Data can lie, so don't be too superstitious about collective consensus.

View OriginalReply0