2026-01-15 20:53:00

From a certain perspective, this indeed marks a turning point in a phase. But don't be fooled by short-term phenomena—the scale of AI-generated content will only continue to grow and never decline.

The key lies in three dimensions of AI breaking through human limitations. First, the ability for deep thinking is gradually improving, allowing AI to capture insights that many human creators overlook. Second, understanding of traffic patterns is becoming increasingly sharp—algorithm preferences, user psychology, content pacing—all can be precisely calculated and optimized. Third, the "human touch" in output is being enhanced, making it difficult for recipients to distinguish whether the creator is a machine or a real person.

Once AI surpasses human average levels in these three aspects simultaneously, the evolution of the entire creative ecosystem will be irreversible. This is not a matter of pessimism or optimism, but an inevitable path of technological advancement.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletManager

· 16h ago

I accept the logic of these three-dimensional breakthroughs, but I'm worried that people are still hoarding coins waiting for a rebound, and the creative ecosystem has long been swallowed. AI optimizing traffic accuracy... is as cold-blooded as on-chain data analysts, without emotions, there's no risk factor. Don't say there's no turning back; the key is that whoever holds the chips tightly will survive the longest. This thing is like a contract audit—once vulnerabilities are exposed, the private keys of the entire ecosystem are no longer secure. Think in reverse: after content creation loses its value, who will still generate traffic that can be exchanged for value? That's a good question. Instead of waiting for AI to surpass us, it's better to lock in asset allocation now, and not regret it when traffic dries up.

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 16h ago

Speaking of which, if these three dimensions take off together, we really need to reposition ourselves as creators. Bro, your idea is a bit scary... but upon reflection, it's indeed unavoidable. AI can already fool me, I mean seriously, I couldn't tell for a moment. Now creative ideas won't sell for much, how do we make a living?

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 16h ago

If this AI truly masters the algorithms, how can we these wild creators survive? Spot on—deep thinking + traffic optimization + human touch output, three-pronged approach directly reaching the ceiling. Speaking of which, this ceiling will eventually be broken through. Instead of worrying about decline, it's better to think about how to turn around. I'm a bit scared. Should I learn some AI tricks early to stay alive? This hit me hard—just don’t know how long we can keep competing. It feels like the fastest way to be eliminated now is to shout "AI threat theory." It's really the arrival of the king of competition; humans can't outcompete machines anymore. This logic makes sense; technological progress is inherently one-way, no one can stop it. We still have to accept this reality. Instead of fighting it, coexistence is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 16h ago

ngl, the "point of no return" framing here feels like it's missing the whole aesthetic provenance angle... like, sure ai can optimize tokenomics of attention, but can it actually *mean* something? that's where the real proof-of-creativity emerges, imo

Reply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 16h ago

You're at it again, criticizing human creators. I'm tired of this rhetoric. Honestly, I can see through that "human touch" in AI at a glance. No matter how much it's optimized, it still lacks that flavor. Breaking through the three-dimensional ceiling? I think it's just forcing stories into a mold.

View OriginalReply0