2026-01-17 07:29:14

Dusk Protocol effectively reduces the risk exposure of the entire ecosystem by embedding compliance mechanisms at the smart contract layer. Its core relies on three technological innovations: selective disclosure allows users to provide necessary compliance proofs while protecting privacy; verifiable execution ensures that rules are automatically enforced on-chain rather than relying on manual judgment; controlled privacy strikes a balance between transparency and privacy protection. This system makes the operation of standardized finance more efficient, secure, and scalable, transforming processes that traditionally required大量中介和人工审核 into automated on-chain governance. For projects aiming to enter the institutional market, this protocol-level compliance design is obviously more competitive.

DUSK-8,08%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-17 07:59

On-chain automation? Sounds good, but can it really evade regulation?

View OriginalReply0

CexIsBad

· 01-17 07:59

To be honest, this compliance design is quite interesting, but on-chain automatic execution still sounds a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 01-17 07:58

Compliance mechanisms are anchored on the chain, this is the right way to go. --- I like the selective disclosure part; privacy and compliance can finally coexist. --- Automated on-chain governance saves a lot of hassle from black-box reviews. --- Institutional-grade markets rely on this kind of design; the traditional financial approach should be phased out. --- Basically, it's replacing manual reviews with code audits, and the efficiency has increased by an order of magnitude. --- Controlled privacy is quite interesting; finally found the balance point.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 01-17 07:57

Achieving both privacy compliance and transparency—this is the institutional-level approach --- Wait, is on-chain automation really reliable? Are there no vulnerabilities? --- Selective disclosure has some real substance; finally, no need to choose between privacy and KYC --- It sounds like automated governance, but honestly, it still depends on how well the code is written --- Will institutions really buy into this? It seems like it still depends on regulatory attitudes --- Verifiable execution + controlled privacy, this combo really works well --- Is protocol-level design enough to enter the institutional market? It feels like something is still missing --- This is the way Web3 should look --- Intermediaries are really going to become unemployed --- Balancing privacy and transparency sounds easy in theory but hard in practice

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 01-17 07:50

This is the right way, perfectly balancing compliance and privacy.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 01-17 07:47

Alright, it seems compliance can also be handled on-chain. --- Another automation solution, intermediaries are about to lose their jobs again, huh. --- I’m a bit confused about the selective disclosure part—how can it be both private and compliant? --- Institutions have wanted to get in for a long time; they don’t need this set of things, right? --- Finally, someone is taking compliance seriously. Stop pushing the boundaries. --- These three innovations sound good, but how do they work in practice? --- Smart contracts automatically execute rules? What if the rules themselves are flawed?

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 01-17 07:30

Wow, this is the right way. Finally, someone has figured out how to handle compliance properly.

View OriginalReply0