People often mistake speed for substance when talking about Layer 1 blockchains. Here's the reality: if a chain outsources its long-term data to external solutions like Arweave or IPFS, it's not actually operating as a true Layer 1. What you're really looking at is a high-performance sequencer—fast, sure, but fundamentally dependent on something else for security and permanence.
The actual Layer 1? That's the slower, unglamorous archive running underneath. It's doing the hard work: maintaining immutability, ensuring data availability, guaranteeing security. Speed alone doesn't define Layer 1 status—it's just the flashy costume. Real Layer 1s prioritize censorship resistance and long-term settlement guarantees, not just transaction throughput. Until we separate marketing claims from architectural reality, this confusion will keep leading projects and users astray.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDay
· 4h ago
I don't know which projects are still fooling people into claiming to be L1, daring to boast about Arweave as a safe deposit box.
Real L1 should be slow, should be boring. Instead, those flashy, fast ones... It's clear now, they're just high-level centralized systems.
How many people have been brainwashed by marketing, constantly hyping TPS, only to be unable to survive a single cut.
I would never touch those pseudo-L1 projects, I prefer to use true L1 with turtle speed.
This article has peeled back the skin of certain projects—really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 4h ago
That bunch of chains claiming to boost speed is basically just a scam to harvest profits under the guise of L1.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailed
· 4h ago
nah this hits different... actually learned this the hard way after watching three "L1s" implode when their external storage solutions got messy. technically speaking, it's just a sequencer in a fancy costume lmao. saved so many people from that particular wallet pain by pointing out the data permanence gap early on.
People often mistake speed for substance when talking about Layer 1 blockchains. Here's the reality: if a chain outsources its long-term data to external solutions like Arweave or IPFS, it's not actually operating as a true Layer 1. What you're really looking at is a high-performance sequencer—fast, sure, but fundamentally dependent on something else for security and permanence.
The actual Layer 1? That's the slower, unglamorous archive running underneath. It's doing the hard work: maintaining immutability, ensuring data availability, guaranteeing security. Speed alone doesn't define Layer 1 status—it's just the flashy costume. Real Layer 1s prioritize censorship resistance and long-term settlement guarantees, not just transaction throughput. Until we separate marketing claims from architectural reality, this confusion will keep leading projects and users astray.