When generative AI tools encounter real abuse scenarios, aggressive countermeasures become necessary. Tighter guardrails, usage restrictions, and stricter enforcement emerged as the only viable approach. Zero tolerance for child exploitation and boundary violations. The philosophy here is clear: robust safety protocols roll out alongside product features—no shortcuts, no compromises.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropDreamer
· 10h ago
Zero tolerance needs to be strict, otherwise it really can't be controlled.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 10h ago
Zero tolerance is no problem, I just don't know to what extent it can really be enforced.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 10h ago
That's right, this part really needs to be strict, or it'll get chaotic.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 10h ago
Zero tolerance is definitely the right approach, but I don't know how it will actually be implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 11h ago
There is indeed no compromise, but do current AI companies really achieve that...
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 11h ago
Zero tolerance is easy to talk about, but really implementing it is difficult. How many projects ultimately compromise in the face of利益?
When generative AI tools encounter real abuse scenarios, aggressive countermeasures become necessary. Tighter guardrails, usage restrictions, and stricter enforcement emerged as the only viable approach. Zero tolerance for child exploitation and boundary violations. The philosophy here is clear: robust safety protocols roll out alongside product features—no shortcuts, no compromises.