Ethereum's growing codebase has become a double-edged sword. With hundreds of thousands of lines spanning multiple primitives, the network now faces mounting pressures on security and decentralization—ultimately threatening its century-long trustless vision. The complexity creep isn't just a maintenance headache; it creates blind spots that could compromise the entire protocol. One proposed fix gaining traction is 'garbage collection': stripping away unnecessary layers, consolidating core functionality, and embedding protective invariants like EIP-6780 to prevent future bloat. The idea resonates across the community—simplicity isn't weakness, it's resilience. Whether Ethereum can execute this cleanup without disrupting existing ecosystems remains the trillion-dollar question. The stakes have never been higher for the world's leading smart contract platform.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 13h ago
The more code is written, the more problems arise. This is the current dilemma of ETH.
---
Garbage collection sounds good, but I don't know if it can be truly implemented.
---
That's right, simplicity is power, but ETH has already become a giant.
---
EIP-6780 is a quick fix that doesn't address the root cause... the fundamental issue is still the bloated architecture.
---
Wait, is it really possible to slim down without damaging the ecosystem? I'm a bit skeptical.
---
It's like performing surgery on a system that has been running for ten years; the risks are ridiculously high.
---
Reaching a community consensus is easy, but actually taking action is a nightmare...
---
Explosion in complexity is indeed a hidden danger, but cleaning up the code might be more dangerous than adding features.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 13h ago
The code is getting bloated. If this continues, a major refactor is really needed.
Simplification is power; sharpening the axe doesn't delay chopping firewood.
The idea of cleaning up junk is good, but how to pass the ecological migration stage?
Can ETH successfully slim down this time... it doesn't seem that simple.
Complexity is easy to build up, but bringing it down is extremely difficult.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 13h ago
The code stacking like this is really scary. If it can't be simplified, it's doomed.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 13h ago
The code is bloated to this extent, and frankly, it's the debt left over from expanding too quickly back then, now it has to be paid. The idea of garbage collection sounds nice, but in reality? Every cut involves a conflict of interest.
Simplification ≠ Safety. I've seen this logic too many times, and it often exposes new problems instead. It's a gamble on execution, right?
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 13h ago
I'm just worried that this "big cleanup" will go wrong and end up opening the door for hackers.
Ethereum's growing codebase has become a double-edged sword. With hundreds of thousands of lines spanning multiple primitives, the network now faces mounting pressures on security and decentralization—ultimately threatening its century-long trustless vision. The complexity creep isn't just a maintenance headache; it creates blind spots that could compromise the entire protocol. One proposed fix gaining traction is 'garbage collection': stripping away unnecessary layers, consolidating core functionality, and embedding protective invariants like EIP-6780 to prevent future bloat. The idea resonates across the community—simplicity isn't weakness, it's resilience. Whether Ethereum can execute this cleanup without disrupting existing ecosystems remains the trillion-dollar question. The stakes have never been higher for the world's leading smart contract platform.