The essay explores whether Bitcoin serves primarily to evade regulation, traditional banking, taxes, and inflation, featuring insights from philosopher Sebastián Ortiz on these topics.
The essay discusses the ongoing debate in the cryptocurrency market between Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), questioning the lasting influence of narratives versus utility, and whether BTC may lose its relevance.
Marcelo Fleischer challenged Bitcoin maximalists at LABITCONF, questioning BTC's fundamentals during the panel "Los Herederos de Alberdi." His arguments sparked reactions and comments, highlighting the intensity of the debate.
Marcelo Fleischer challenged Bitcoin maximalists at LABITCONF during the panel "Los Herederos de Alberdi," sparking intense debate and reactions with his arguments against BTC fundamentals.
BTC miners face disappointment due to lack of scalability, leading them to consider BCH as an option to preserve their capital value. It is questioned whether this is a temporary increase or the beginning of the decline in BTC's dominance.
I’ve analyzed the logic behind BCH taking off: from the RSI perspective, the coefficient has completely broken through the upper Bollinger Band. Saylor’s coin hoarding theory is starting to look a bit powerless in front of the miners.
The train hasn't left! (stop lamenting) When Satoshi Nakamoto proposed Bitcoin, many people laughed at his idea. Throughout the crypto world, there are many first-hand stories about people underestimating the potential of the concept that today
The essay discusses the ongoing debate in the market between BTC and BCH, questioning whether narrative or utility will prevail. It also explores investor awareness and speculates on BTC's future relevance in the cryptocurrency landscape.
The essay explores whether the primary function of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, is to evade regulation, banking systems, taxes, and discretionary inflation, featuring insights from philosopher Sebastián Ortiz.